Software giants' latest, greatest prove print's not dead --
yet
BOSTON -- Print mavens got a cold, dreary reception at the Seybold
Seminars last month. Outside the convention center, the slushy streets, gray skies and
biting wind served to keep things grim. Inside, dozens of sessions proclaimed the death of
print. "Roll over and die" was the theme of the week.
Fortunately, the word did not trickle down to the not-insignificant number
of people who avoided the fancy sessions and stayed with the exhibitors in the main arena,
Feb. 7-11. New workflow products for ad processing, along with new tools from Adobe and
Quark as well as new products from traditional newspaper suppliers belied the doomsayers
up the escalators.
What did trickle from the conference rooms in the center's third floor to
the exhibition halls on the lower floors were a veritable kitchen sink's worth of beta
products, actual working products and some of the year's hottest acronyms, DAM, MAM and
XML. Everyone was touting the importance of Digital Asset Management as the way to keep
print publications afloat, with some vendors going their neighbors one better with Media
Asset Management (the same as DAM, but it costs more) and "eXtensible Markup Language
compatibility" for good measure. Adobe and Quark each have XML compatible formats --
or will any day now -- and dozens of others are piling on the bandwagon. Lowly archive
systems are now DAM (or MAM) tools, which, of course, store data with XML tags to allow
repurposing of content.
InDesign, unveiled by Adobe Systems Corp. of San Jose at Seybold Boston
last year, was everywhere on the show floor, along with companion products InProduction
and InCopy, products designed to help the workflow process on the tail end of the
pre-press operation (InProduction) and copy editing on the other end (InCopy). Other
products shown off by Adobe included updates to InDesign (Look! Like last year! Except
it's a set of new features that don't work!), PressReady for color proofing on the desktop
(Hmmm. Wasn't that announced last year?) and PDF Merchant, a server solution for
distributing documents securely. Oh yes, everything here uses XML, or will someday.
Quark Inc. of Denver, not to be outdone, announced that its long-awaited
digital asset management solution -- Quark.DMS, in beta at last year's Seybold Boston --
has shipped. Quark also announced: eStage, a database-driven publishing system designed to
help in the production of catalogs and other direct marketing items; Avenue.Quark, which
will automate some of the process of converting XPress documents into XML-formatted
documents (and vice-versa); XPress 5.0 (Hmmm. Wasn't that announced last year, too?),
which will create PDF files as well as use XML tags, and an as-yet unnamed product for web
site management.
Adobe noise
As last year, InDesign was generating a lot of noise. What Adobe and its partners had last
year were alpha and beta products as well as a promise of a different way of doing things.
This year, they had shipping products from dozens of vendors to exhibit in their partner
pavilion. Longtime newspaper vendors have incorporated InDesign into their products -- or
at least started the process -- using InDesign to replace existing modules (in the case of
Digital Technology International -- DTI -- of Springville, Utah) or supplement them (in
the case of Baseview Products of Ann Arbor, Mich.).
InCopy, a new module from Adobe, is designed to bring some of the
functionality of InDesign to traditional copy desk jobs. Working much like InDesign
without the layout capability, InCopy gives a tight link between the layout and content,
allowing reporters and editors to see line endings, column breaks and the like. They also
can use some of the standard editing functions common in newspaper front-end systems.
Newspaper vendors who have already announced that they would incorporate InDesign -- DTI,
Baseview and System Integrators Inc. of Sacramento -- announced they are incorporating
InCopy into their products.
Erik Schut, system architect for Mediasystemen, a pre-press supplier in
the Netherlands, said that for him, using InCopy means he doesn't have to write a piece of
core technology, but can build on what Adobe has given him.
"InCopy is InDesign with the design functions removed," Schut
said. "With this, I can start a new document without a shape or get a document
exported from InDesign and write to fit the shape."
Schut said it also had "additional functionality for reporters and
editors, such as galley mode and revision tracking as well as changes to the user
interface to make it more word based, removing some of the palates" that Adobe
products scatter about the desktop.
Schut said, however, that InCopy was somewhat limited, and newspaper
suppliers would be able to distinguish themselves by using its plug-in architecture to add
functionality required by newsrooms.
Alyson Oldham, marketing director for Digital Technology, said that InCopy
will replace DTI's SpeedWriter, much the way InDesign replaced PageSpeed.
"We're developing plug-ins to add to the geometry view, text editor
and galley view," Oldham said.
Oldham did not show much concern for giving up a piece of the core product
to an outside developer. "Giving up SpeedWriter for a new generation of Adobe
products has given us some flexibility," she said. "We can do XML to [Newspaper
Information Text Format] NIFT to delimited text. We have the functionality we had in
SpeedWriter, plus all this new stuff."
Switching to InDesign from its own in-house products has prompted some
changes for DTI.
"As InCopy evolves, we've made adjustments to our own
development," Oldham said. "What we first saw of InCopy, we didn't think it
would work in a newspaper environment. But that has changed, the cross-pollination between
us has helped."
Another arrow
Baseview, like DTI, has incorporated part of Adobe's new toolset in both its ad and
editorial product lineup.
Adobe's InDesign has been incorporated into Baseview's
ProductionManagerPro, allowing users to quickly check for missing fonts, improper file
formats and the host of other niggling problems that cripple workflow.
Jeff Gapp, product manager for ProductionManagerPro, said InDesign was one
more arrow in the quiver for him.
"If a site has ProductionManager, they can simply install InDesign
and use it," Gapp said. "We already can work with [Quark] XPress 3 and 4 and the
[MultiAd] Creator products. This is just another one we can use."
Gapp also liked Adobe's InProduction product, which on the surface seems
to do much what his product does. "The more they can make PDFs better for pre-press,
the better off I am," he said.
On the editorial side, Baseview is adding InCopy to its lineup,
supplementing its existing text editor, NewsEditPro.
"NewsEdit is a combination of a text editor and a browser into the
database," said David Luther, Baseview's director of development. "It would be
kind of dumb to rip it out. I think people will still bang out text in it. InCopy will be
an add-on that they can use when needed."
Baseview, which like many of the other newspaper suppliers, was exhibiting
as part of the Adobe booth, leading to some interesting discussions about the status of
existing products.
"I can't use the 'Q' word here," Luther said, showing off some
of his products, "but what we are shipping is Q with InDesign to come. We have an
ugly demo now with it, but should be showing the full thing at NEXPO."
Similar comments came from the folks in the SII booth in the Adobe
pavilion, who were proudly showing InSIIght, a product incorporating Lotus Notes, InDesign
and some other tools developed in conjunction with Associated MediaBase in London. Only
after taking some furtive looks about would SII representatives say the product currently
being installed in London uses Quark XPress, with InDesign integration to come later.
"All I have here are screen shots," an SII representative said.
At the other end of the hall, the people from Quark were taking advantage
of the slow roll-out of InDesign products, showing off features in XPress and related
products that will make it easier to produce PDFs without using Adobe's Distiller, move
data into and out of XPress and use content for other purposes.
With Avenue.Quark, "You can take content out of a Quark XPress
document and put it in a neutral format such as XML," said Mark Hansen. "You can
drag and drop into XML and come back into print or go out to the Web."
Not even alpha
Quark's web site management tool, officially unnamed but referred to as Sitemap, is a new
one for Quark according to Eric Barnard. "The product runs on Windows and has no
particular connection to any other Quark software," Barnard, a program management
specialist at the company, said. "It's a standalone product."
Sitemap was designed to separate design, content and management tools,
sending those functions to the appropriate person, much the way newspaper publishing
systems separate out copy editing, reporting and design functions. "We used to have
typing pools, then word processing departments and then we all proved we could type for
ourselves," Barnard said. "This is to do the same thing, letting people who need
to do a function do it without calling an outside department."
Sitemap is a long way from competing in the market, though, since it is
not expected to go to alpha code until later this month.
Off the show floor, quite a few things were happening, some good and some
bad, for the purveyors of print.
Everyone, as Quark founder Tim Gill put it, is worshipping at the altar of
XML, hoping to find ways to share content, moving it to wherever it can make some money.
"On the Web, everyone is a publisher," Gill said. "We can take our content
and resell it. We can take others' content and use it where appropriate. XML has
simplicity that others don't have to do that."
In that vein, XML standards and proposals for XML standards were popping
off like Champagne corks. One, proposed by Adobe, Agfa, Heidelberg and Man Roland, is for
a job definition format, or JDF. The JDF combines the attributes of the PDF-based Portable
Job Ticket Format (Pjtf) used in the pre-press arena with the Co-operation for Pre-press,
Press & Post-press (CIP3) information used to handle cross-departmental information,
throwing in connections to a company's business and management systems. Despite all the
acronyms and myriad connections, the proposal is to use PDF and XML to make it easier to
track from the preproduction stages through post-production, containing information that
can be used in press and mailroom setup, specialized delivery such as microzoning and be
able to bill appropriately.
The group, formed in early 1999, hopes to present a final specification at
the Drupa conference in May and transfer its work to one of the official standards bodies
in June. More information is, of course, on the web site at
On the XML front, several people from one of the standards groups held a
public flogging session as they tried to describe the process of hammering out these
standards. XML was not enough as the panel argued over differences that had bedeviled them
in official meetings over the years. Xhtml, Xslt, HTML and a host of others were paraded
out, worshipped and crucified in the 90-minute session. People hunting a better idea of
what they were and how they worked went away perplexed, but those who enjoy the
legislative sessions were pleased. Dave Winer, president of Burlingame, Calif.'s Userland
Software Inc., and developer of the popular Frontier scripting environment, described his
approach to standards. "Standards are a way to make organizations more
efficient," he said. "If they make your company more efficient, then use them.
If not, then don't."
Another popular session was on hiring and retaining staff in the Internet
age. Unfortunately, the audience of print shop owners, newspaper managers and their print
brethren found little fertile ground here. Panelists were dot-commers and high-tech
companies complaining about finding CEOs, CIOs and the like, or the perfidy of staffers
who would take a $10,000 to $15,000 bonus to stay and then leave anyway. How many of those
were passed out in your newsroom this year? And how many did the dot-commers pass out
before finding out it didn't work?
Print mavens looking for tips on competing in the Internet age also got a
grim reception at one of the keynote sessions, with Thad McIlroy, program director for
Seybold Seminars, announcing that though print looks healthy, the underpinnings are dead
or dying. Although sales of print products are steady, and profits for newspapers and the
like are up, McIlroy said that continuing softness in circulation and more compelling
competition for readers' eyes -- and time -- are going to wipe many of us out. The
solution? Do what Ziff-Davis, owners of the Seybold Seminars, did. Sell your print
publications and move to the Web.